View Full Version : More useless title, Women's or Cruiserweight?
The quality of the women in the ring is so bad right now and while the CW division is no great wonder at least most of them can work - compared to the eyesore that is almost every women's match not involving Mickie & Victoria.
Trixie Dominatrix
04-19-2007, 03:03 PM
Of course everyone's gonna say the Women's Title is useless because their women and this is a wrestling company, imo this is an unfair kinda of debate because it's oneside. Why not make an I.C. vs. US title debate.
But to answer your question, both are useless at this point, but the Cruiserweight obviously has a better chance of stepping it up.
rkosweetie
04-19-2007, 03:32 PM
The whole Cruiserweight division sucks right now. The only good one is Shannon Moore and he gets no air time. The women's division went down hill after Trish and Lita left, now they're all skanks and it's all about who takes off the most clothes.:unno
toe nail124
04-19-2007, 03:35 PM
The whole Cruiserweight division sucks right now. The only good one is Shannon Moore and he gets no air time. The women's division went down hill after Trish and Lita left, now they're all skanks and it's all about who takes off the most clothes.:unno
i agree with everything but you saying the cw division sucks the cw division is the best division in the wwe all the ppl in it are great workers and can put on great matches but they need more air time and more of a push
UTisNUM1
04-19-2007, 03:54 PM
Women's is more useless. It isnt Women's "Wrestling" anymore, it is Women's "Rolling and Screaming".
davrho
04-19-2007, 04:53 PM
The womans division is shocking. Can it be called wrestling? The Divas are stuck in a rut. Not pretty enough to model. Not athletic enough to wrestle. Hopefully hd will show their deficiencies and then the wwe will employ female wrestlers again.
The coverage of the cruiserweight is poor but a lot more entertaining than the divas.Lets see more cw wrestling!
I stick by my statement that it is only a matter of time before one of the divas is crippled by a stupid mistake.....
Of course everyone's gonna say the Women's Title is useless because their women and this is a wrestling company, imo this is an unfair kinda of debate because it's oneside. Why not make an I.C. vs. US title debate.
But to answer your question, both are useless at this point, but the Cruiserweight obviously has a better chance of stepping it up.
To be fair though if you look at the CW champion (Chavo) and the Women's champion (Melina) in the WWE's eyes Melina is probably worth more as an asset to the company.
The whole Cruiserweight division sucks right now. The only good one is Shannon Moore and he gets no air time. The women's division went down hill after Trish and Lita left, now they're all skanks and it's all about who takes off the most clothes.:unno
The part I bolded is completely wrong, Chavo, Greg Helms, Jimmy Wang, Funaki are all good wrestlers that could carry the belt as well as Moore, and I didn't even mention their two best cruiserweights in London and Kendrick( I left them out because they are in the tag division)
As far as the womens division goes, there are only 2 divas good enough to hold the belt and that is Mickie and Victoria, Melina should never ever hold that title, she is barely better than Candice
So yeah, the womens title is more useless
Trixie Dominatrix
04-19-2007, 08:22 PM
To be fair though if you look at the CW champion (Chavo) and the Women's champion (Melina) in the WWE's eyes Melina is probably worth more as an asset to the company.
But since Chavo is related to Eddie, Vince would see him as a bigger assest. Plus Melina's attitude problem doesnt help her case much. They way I see it Chavo would be worth more then Melina.
Violet
04-19-2007, 08:30 PM
The difference is, the cruiserweight division have the wrestlers to make a decent division, but the women's division have only 2 good female wrestlers, the rest are diva search girls and it'd be an insult to any good female wrestler if one of those girls ever hold the title.
davrho
04-20-2007, 09:10 AM
The difference is, the cruiserweight division have the wrestlers to make a decent division, but the women's division have only 2 good female wrestlers, the rest are diva search girls and it'd be an insult to any good female wrestler if one of those girls ever hold the title.
You cannot argue with that. Well summed up
tredoffer
04-20-2007, 10:43 AM
I think that neither of the titles is especially useless, they need to be there to diversify, but the womens division right now is definently horrible, only Mickie James and Victoria can actually wrestle. In the CW division you have many great performers, especially noy that London and Kendrick are no longer tag-champs. Unfortunately, they don't get that much airtime because the Undertakers entrance takes up half the show ;-)
selby
04-20-2007, 02:45 PM
Both have gd champs but cruiserweight divison have better wrestlers in it at the moment as the womes only have mickie and victoria and kind of melina but I would say IC means shit all at the moment with that Itallian bloke haveing it and umaga before him
coolwhip
04-21-2007, 09:41 AM
without a doubt the women's title is more useless..
the cruiserweight division can actually be exciting in the WWE choose to push it.. look at the X division in TNA.. those guys are entertaining light weights
The Women's division is at least booked with some sense of logic. Can anyone tell me why Chavo and Helms are now a team. Makes absoluetly no sense - the longest reigning CW champion loses tiltle and instead of trying to reclaim it -> tags w/ the new champ?
LegendKiller 13
04-21-2007, 01:41 PM
i dont think either are useless there just under used
Violet
04-21-2007, 07:16 PM
The Women's division is at least booked with some sense of logic.
Hmm not really as all the heel divas are the talented ones and remember they did have Trashley 'wrestle' for the title at WM. That made no sense.
vBulletin® v3.7.3, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.