View Full Version : Batista vs Scott Steiner
Hades
03-26-2007, 03:20 AM
Both are pathetic in the ring. Both are obviously pumped up on steriods. Both are getting pushes they don't deserve and beating more deserving people. Despite the fact they are plagues to the wrestling world, Who is better? Or at least more tolerable?
cena645
03-26-2007, 06:36 AM
Batista, Scott Steiner is just pathetic he cant move. Batitsa can atleast move.
bawjustice
03-26-2007, 07:25 AM
scott stiener was a great wrestler before he deformed himself
batista was never a great wrestler
i go with scott stiener
Batista of fuckin course...
I mean the guy is a god in the ring and on the mic....
He doesnt even have to say anything and he has you eating out of the palm of his hand....
villin
03-26-2007, 03:30 PM
then why dont you go lick the nut off of his fingers. BATISTA SUCKS.
Steiner was the shit back in the day & he still is. he hasnt had any big push for the record. he just rips on the mic & funny as hell.
"Do i look like a quaszi moto to you"
UTisNUM1
03-26-2007, 03:33 PM
Batista and Steiner are both garbage. Steiner gets my vote because before the massive roid usage, he could wrestle.
then why dont you go lick the nut off of his fingers. BATISTA SUCKS.
Steiner was the shit back in the day & he still is. he hasnt had any big push for the record. he just rips on the mic & funny as hell.
"Do i look like a quaszi moto to you"
How about no...
You gonna flame because I am a fan of Batista?
How fuckin lame.
Batista > Scott Steiner.
villin
03-26-2007, 03:39 PM
yea thats why batista is reffered to as the Warrior
Right now,like UT said, they both suck, but I will go with Steiner because back in WCW(before the Big Poppa Pump days) he was actually a real good wrestler
Steiner. He was a pretty ghood wrestler and as Big Poppa Pump he was a pretty good heel and carried Goldberg to HELL of a match.
Steiner. He was a pretty ghood wrestler and as Big Poppa Pump he was a pretty good heel and carried Goldberg to HELL of a match.
No way Ben, Batista rock your socks and you know it...
He does, but Steiner rocks 'em that little bit more :yay:
RatedRTitan
03-26-2007, 04:01 PM
I am going with Batista. If we wanted to compare the old Scott Steiner with Batista then that's what the thread would be about. Right now I am assuming that it is Batista 2007 vs Steiner 2007. In that case, Batista hands down.
Steiner and Triple H put on 2 of the worst World Title matches in WWE/F History when they fought at the Rumble and at No Way Out. Steiner is way too built for wrestling. He is very slow and only has about 3 moves and then the Steiner Recliner.
Batista at least brings the crowd to its feet and is better to watch. He has enthusiasm in the ring despite being the biggest asshole in the backstage area. Steiner hasn't been good since being the WCW Champion and even then, Booker T carried his ass through all his matches.
superstevie
03-26-2007, 10:06 PM
Batista may not have the biggest arsenal of moves but his charisma and spinebuster do it for me and he is actually smart.
superstevie
03-26-2007, 10:07 PM
of course batista is good u suck if you dont like him!!!
TR305
03-26-2007, 10:59 PM
Steiner I just can't allow myself to feed into Batista
vBulletin® v3.7.3, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.