Mike Awesome vs. Undertaker

[HSM]

Now this is the big man debate, to me and other members it's a no brainer, but who is better Taker or Awesome?

I will post my thoughts at a later time

[cutabove75]

Mike Awesome jesus christ that's easy. He was a much better wrestler, high flyer, and hardcore wrestler then taker could ever dream to be. Plus it doesn't hurt that he had a killer mullet

[UTisNUM1]

Undertaker's gimmick doesnt allow him to be all loud and "HardCore". Undertaker is slower paced and Mike Awesome is faster paced. They both are great.

The Undertaker and Mike Awesome are equal to me. Slight nudge to Taker because i am a Taker mark so take everything with a grain of salt.

[Matt]

Awesome. He was a great wrestler, who was very 'well-rounded' in the ring, and he made the best of one horrible gimmick.

[DoctaBuu]

would that gimmick be that 70's guy or the fat chick thriller lol they are both great i perfer taker overall but i would still mike awesome was he better wrestler

[bawjustice]

mike awsome wins hands down

taker is good but awsome is better

theres not much to explain just look at the two and youll realize whos better

[chanandler20]

Both great big guys, and are/were able to perform in the ring. But I'll take 'Taker because he has a 5 star match and Awesome was pretty much of douchebag by how he left ECW.

[Ben]

I like both. But I pick Awesome too, the things he did for his size were uncanny. Not that the stuff Taker has done isn't, but Awesome was the man and did it in such a way that just made you think "WOW" The way he left ECW, granted, was cheap. But the guy had to do it, he was so talented and was being offered so much money by WCW he wasn't in a position to say noi. And I'm guessing WCW bribed him into coming to them the way he did. If it were up to Awesome I'm sure he'd try and be a little more honourable. The things he did to entertain the fans, the bumps he took, just makes me think he loved ECW and money simply blinded him momenterally. I miss Mike and really wish he could've been used like the monster he truly was. Only Paul and FMW truly used him for the beast he could be.

[toe nail124]

awesome is so much better then taker in the ring but just about every one who picks taker will use his gimmick as an excuse

[HSM]

I also have to pick Awesome, for being the size he was he had great in ring skills and agility, Taker did as well, but in my opinion wasn't close to Awesome

[Hades]

Undertaker is my choice. Gimmick aside, I think Taker had better ring psycology.(Sorry if is mispelled) and understands the business better. He is better at protecting his oppenant during a match.

Ten years from now, I will only remember Awesome doing those powerbombs to the outside of the ring or through a table, or both at the same time.

[toe nail124]

and ten yrs from now i will only remember taker for his gimmick

[cutabove75]

lol owned