HBK vs. Taker

[Trixie Dominatrix]

An idea from Violet, here's your thread.

Discuss

[UTisNUM1]

There is no need to compare these two. HbK is more slim and fast so he can manuver faster than Taker can. Taker is an athletic big guy who can wrestle good. Both are great wrestlers, both have tons of experience.

[toe nail124]

hbk by far hbk is so much more athletic, charismatic, an well basicly just overal better than taker dont get me wrtong im a taker fan but if he didnt have the gimmick he has he wouldnt have gone this far

[TRS]

They are both exellent wrestlers...2 of my favorites....not too much to debate about

like ut said...just the size and speed and power,but they are both really good

[Steve0904]

It's hard to debate anything about Taker really. You can't really match a big man with a smaller man and if we were to debate about someone the same size (take Umaga for example) people would probably say well Taker has more experience so people would go with Taker. And everyone knows without Taker there would be no Kane. Either way you put it, people like Taker because of his gimmick but also because there aren't many big men that can do what he can so that's why it's hard to go with Taker. If I was to pick I would say HBK but like I said it's hard to go with Taker but not for some bad reason

[Violet]

Undertaker. I like Shawn, but he's Vince's golden boy and it makes me wonder if he truely earned all those championships. Taker is more exciting to watch and i like his gimmick better. Though sweet chin music is a killer finisher. I like Shawn, but Taker is a whole lot better.

[Matt]

HBK. Michaels is easily better in the ring, he's better on the mic, and he didn't need a ridiculous gimmick to get him where he is today. HBK > Taker for me.

[KingofKings-]

taker

simply because they both are good, but taker will leave behind his 14-0 wm streak (soon to be 15-0 i think)

[Hades]

Undertaker will be remembered longer then HBK.

[TR305]

Both have done alot for the company and have put on great matches. Both future hall of famers but I'm going to give it to The Undertaker. He has the total package, look, gimmick good at putting people over very loyal. This doenst take things away from HBK as they are probally my top favorite wrestlers but The Deadman gets this one

[wordlife86]

hbk all the time.

both are great wrestlers,both future hall of famers, but i ll say that the charisma play a huge role on this debate, so i ll say hbk, and i dont think that the fact that shawn is a vince`s golden boy made a huge impact at the time to give shawn all the titles, he deserves them because of what he is... the showstopper, your next wwe champ!